TY - GEN
T1 - A study on the thighness parameter used in the evaluation of the pvrc gasket constants
AU - Bouzid, Abdel Hakim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 by ASME.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The value of the tightness exponent used in the leakage-Topressure relationship has faced significant criticism. It was developed during a time when fiber gaskets were the standard, prior to the introduction of more advanced gasket materials like flexible graphite and PTFE in the early 1990s which are much tighter and require less load to seal. To account for the diverse flow regimes that may occur in modern gasket materials, a reevaluation of the pressure-Tightness relationship is necessary. This is achieved by an evaluation of the slope of the leak rates plotted against a wide range of fluid pressures and repeated at different gasket stress levels. Therefore, a comprehensive study involving leak tests conducted on various gasket materials and fluid media, subjected to different internal pressures and contact stresses, has been conducted to adjust this correlation. The findings indicate that a tightness exponent of , rather than the current , more accurately reflects real-world conditions. For a comparison purpose, the gasket constants calculated with tightness parameter based on both exponents were used to predict leak rates. It was found that the revised constant produces more accurate predictions, better aligning with measured leak rates. The presence of the different types of flows including porous and surface leaks, laminar and molecular that can be present individually or combined in any given gasket are better described. The required gasket contact stresses to achieve target leak rates were found to be lower. This version enhances readability, ensures technical clarity, and improves the overall predictions.
AB - The value of the tightness exponent used in the leakage-Topressure relationship has faced significant criticism. It was developed during a time when fiber gaskets were the standard, prior to the introduction of more advanced gasket materials like flexible graphite and PTFE in the early 1990s which are much tighter and require less load to seal. To account for the diverse flow regimes that may occur in modern gasket materials, a reevaluation of the pressure-Tightness relationship is necessary. This is achieved by an evaluation of the slope of the leak rates plotted against a wide range of fluid pressures and repeated at different gasket stress levels. Therefore, a comprehensive study involving leak tests conducted on various gasket materials and fluid media, subjected to different internal pressures and contact stresses, has been conducted to adjust this correlation. The findings indicate that a tightness exponent of , rather than the current , more accurately reflects real-world conditions. For a comparison purpose, the gasket constants calculated with tightness parameter based on both exponents were used to predict leak rates. It was found that the revised constant produces more accurate predictions, better aligning with measured leak rates. The presence of the different types of flows including porous and surface leaks, laminar and molecular that can be present individually or combined in any given gasket are better described. The required gasket contact stresses to achieve target leak rates were found to be lower. This version enhances readability, ensures technical clarity, and improves the overall predictions.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020851322
U2 - 10.1115/PVP2025-151452
DO - 10.1115/PVP2025-151452
M3 - Contribution to conference proceedings
AN - SCOPUS:105020851322
T3 - American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP
BT - Computer Technology and Bolted Joints
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME 2025 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP 2025
Y2 - 20 July 2025 through 25 July 2025
ER -