Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Machine learning prediction of aircraft anti-icing fluid endurance: A comparative study using natural and artificial snow data

  • Andres Cardona
  • , Haïfa Nakouri
  • , Jean Denis Brassard
  • , Gelareh Momen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Ground ice poses a critical safety risk to winter aviation operations, primarily because the protective endurance of aircraft anti-icing fluids fluctuates unpredictably with volatile weather conditions. To mitigate these risks, this study develops a robust machine learning framework designed to forecast fluid endurance times using high-fidelity data from both artificial and natural snow environments. Research was conducted via endurance tests following the SAE ARP5485B protocol to train and evaluate multiple decision tree-based architectures, specifically the Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models. Model reliability was ensured through rigorous k-fold cross-validation and systematic hyperparameter optimization. Results demonstrate that the optimized XGBoost model achieved superior predictive accuracy, yielding an RMSPE of 15.38% and a MAPE of 8.88%. Furthermore, SHAP analysis identified snow deposition rate and ambient temperature as the most influential determinants of fluid failure. These findings suggest that integrating machine learning into endurance testing can revolutionize current safety protocols and facilitate precise, data-driven decision-making for winter ground operations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112103
JournalAerospace Science and Technology
Volume176
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2026

!!!Keywords

  • Aircraft anti-icing fluid endurance
  • Artificial snow
  • Machine learning
  • Natural snow

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Machine learning prediction of aircraft anti-icing fluid endurance: A comparative study using natural and artificial snow data'. These topics are generated from the title and abstract of the publication. Together, they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this