Abstract
Social responsibility issues keep reoccurring despite the popularity of numerous approaches perceived widely as adequate. In this paper, the authors conducted a systematic literature review to explore this phenomenon from a systems thinking standpoint. The findings revealed that each approach is founded on a different systemic paradigm, makes different assumptions on the nature of social responsibility issues, and has different objectives when resolving them. Therefore, employing any of these approaches alone will certainly fail given their underlying systemic limitations. The findings also revealed that these approaches are complementary from a critical systems thinking perspective, hence, researchers and practitioners can use their tools and methods together in the form of tailored interventions to better address efficiency, subjectivity, and fairness when resolving social responsibility issues. This paper concludes by proposing a practical framework based on critical systems practice which encompasses four systemic paradigms allowing the inclusion of a spectrum of perspectives, and assumptions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | International Journal of Engineering Business Management |
| Volume | 15 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
!!!Keywords
- JEL Classification
- M14
- Supply chain management
- corporate social responsibility
- critical systems thinking
- social life cycle assessment
- systematic literature review
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The systemic tenets of the key supply chain social responsibility approaches'. These topics are generated from the title and abstract of the publication. Together, they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver