Classic industrial production methods generate significant pressures on natural resources as well as environmental constraints related to product end-of-life management. Closed-loop supply chains are often seen as more eco-efficient alternatives, well known to provide substantial economic and environmental benefits at the scale of the product life cycle. This is notably achieved through important reductions in the overall cost of production, in the needs for new materials and energies, and in the proportion of end-of-life components going to landfill.
Due to their modular designs and the particular dynamics of helicopter service life, light nonpressurized helicopters have proven to be highly receptive to partial or total remanufacture and upgrade, extending their service life, enhancing their performance and modernizing their equipment, often for only a fraction of the cost of a new aircraft. However, little environmental data is available in order to assess the overall eco-efficiency of helicopter upgrade processes.
This study resulted in the creation of a method for the systemic characterization of the processes encountered during the helicopter service life. The arrangement of these processes over time has enabled the construction of helicopter operation cycles, representative of the helicopter service life. These operation cycles have then been characterized, following various criteria based on helicopter designs and usage profiles, in order to study and compare their respective eco-efficiency. A case study is provided to illustrate the application of the method, based on a currently operating industrial business model of helicopter upgrade. This case study intends to provide a first-level assessment of the potential economic, technical and environmental benefits from remanufacturing and upgrading a helicopter, as an alternative production channel.
The study found that compared to its replacement, upgrading a former airframe to a more recent design is generally a more eco-efficient decision. Important reductions were found in most of the profiles assessed, notably, reductions of up to 51 % in terms of production costs, 77.5 % in waste going to landfill, and up to 54 % in energy consumption. The method developed can be seen as a decision-helping tool intended for both operators and manufacturers. The method takes into account Design-for-Environment (DfE) guidelines and Material Recovery Opportunities (MRO), providing better understanding of the adaptability of a given design to fulfill the requirements of optimized reverse supply chains.
| Date | 20 Nov 2015 |
|---|
| Original language | French |
|---|
| Awarding Institution | - École de technologie supérieure
|
|---|
| Supervisor | Mathias Glaus (Supervisor) |
|---|
Rancher, A. (Author),
Glaus (Supervisor),
20 Nov 2015Student thesis: Master's thesis › Master in Engineering: Environmental Engineering