Keyphrases
Overhead Conductor
100%
Conductor Clamp
57%
Beam-to-beam Contact
49%
Fatigue Life
47%
3D Finite Element
41%
Suspension Clamp
40%
Multilayered Wire Strands
35%
Thin-rimmed Gear
35%
Bending Fatigue
35%
Contact Fatigue
35%
Spur Gear
35%
Numerical Characterization
35%
Fretting Fatigue
33%
Crack Propagation
31%
Fatigue Analysis
29%
Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced
29%
Friction Coefficient
26%
Crack Growth
26%
Residual Signal
26%
Cyclic Bending
25%
Fatigue Damage
25%
Dynamic Transmission Error
23%
Gear Set
23%
Aluminum Wire
23%
Factorial Design Method
22%
Wind-induced
22%
Surface Degradation
22%
Numerical Model
21%
Contact Modeling
21%
Finite Element Model
18%
Bending Sensitivity
17%
Contact Coefficient
17%
Local Loading
17%
Stochastic Prediction
17%
6201 Aluminum Alloy
17%
Wind-induced Vibration Analysis
17%
Wind-induced Fatigue
17%
Wear Fatigue
17%
Micropitting
17%
ACSR Conductor
17%
I-models
17%
Boundary Element Method
17%
Tooth Fillet
17%
Crack Modeling
17%
Wind-induced Load
17%
Firefly
17%
Fretting Fatigue Life
17%
Squeeze Damping
17%
PSO Algorithm
17%
Fretting Fatigue Test
17%
Engineering
Fatigue Damage
51%
Fatigue Life
46%
Finite Element Analysis
45%
Wind Induced Vibration
39%
Fretting Fatigue
39%
Strand Wire
35%
Fem Model
35%
Critical Region
35%
Crack Configuration
35%
Progression
35%
Spur Gears
35%
Crack Propagation
35%
Residual Signal
29%
Initial Crack
29%
Transmission Error
26%
Coefficient of Friction
26%
Crack Growth
26%
Strand
25%
Fatigue Analysis
23%
Fatigue Crack
23%
Bending Load
21%
Reinforced Steel
21%
Numerical Model
21%
Mean Value
20%
Finite Element Modeling
18%
Induced Fatigue
17%
Model Response
17%
Boundary Element Method
17%
Critical Fracture
17%
Catastrophic Consequence
17%
Individual Wire
17%
Mild Wear
17%
Local Loading
17%
Firefly Algorithm
17%
Cyclic Loads
17%
Data Show
17%
Fatigue Behavior
17%
Contact Dynamics
17%
Mechanical Fatigue Test
17%
Degradation Process
17%
Crack Propagation Path
17%
Induced Load
17%
Cylindrical Gear
17%
Contact Point
17%
Experimental Measurement
17%
Element Model
17%
Crack Initiation
17%
Quantitative Evaluation
17%
Scaling Factor
17%
Loading Condition
17%