Passer à la navigation principale Passer à la recherche Passer au contenu principal

Crowding Out the Noise: Algorithmic Collective Action under Differential Privacy

  • University of Waterloo
  • École de technologie supérieure

Résultats de recherche: Chapitre dans un livre, rapport, actes de conférenceParticipation à un ouvrage collectif lié à un colloque ou une conférenceRevue par des pairs

Résumé

The integration of AI into daily life has generated considerable attention and excitement, while also raising concerns about automating algorithmic harms and re-entrenching existing social inequities. While the responsible deployment of trustworthy AI systems is a worthy goal, there are many possible ways to realize it, from policy and regulation to improved algorithm design and evaluation. In fact, since AI trains on social data, there is even a possibility for everyday users, citizens, or workers to directly steer the AI system's behavior through Algorithmic Collective Action, by deliberately modifying the data they share with a platform to drive its learning process in their favor. This paper considers how these grassroots efforts to influence AI interact with methods already used by AI firms and governments to improve model trustworthiness. In particular, we focus on the setting where the AI firm deploys a differentially private model, motivated by the growing regulatory focus on privacy and data protection. We investigate how the use of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) affects the collective's ability to influence the learning process. Our findings show that while differential privacy contributes to the protection of individual data, it introduces challenges for effective algorithmic collective action. We establish this trade-off formally by characterizing lower bounds on the success of algorithmic collective action under differential privacy as a function of the collective's size and the firm's privacy parameters. We then verify these trends experimentally by simulating collective action during the training of deep neural network classifiers across several datasets. Finally, we perform a stylized economic analysis of privacy costs in order to integrate additional incentives at play for both parties, analyzing how factors like average utility and participation costs influence the formation of collectives under private training regimes.

langue originaleAnglais
titreACM FAccT 2026 - Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
EditeurAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc
Pages5430-5455
Nombre de pages26
ISBN (Electronique)9798400725968
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 25 juin 2026
Evénement9th Annual ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ACM FAccT 2026 - Montreal, Canada
Durée: 25 juin 202628 juin 2026

Série de publications

NomACM FAccT 2026 - Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

Conférence

Conférence9th Annual ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ACM FAccT 2026
Pays/TerritoireCanada
La villeMontreal
période25/06/2628/06/26

SDG des Nations Unies

Ce résultat contribue à ou aux Objectifs de développement durable suivants

  1. SDG 10 – Inégalités réduites
    SDG 10 – Inégalités réduites

Citer cette ressorce